Hampton v. VA Correctional
Hampton v. VA Correctional
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7298
BEVERLY DOREATHA HAMPTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
VIRGINIA CORRECTIONAL CENTER FOR WOMEN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-696-2)
Submitted: December 18, 1997 Decided: January 7, 1998
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Beverly Doreatha Hampton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing her
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaint without prejudice for failure to ex-
haust administrative remedies. The district court properly required
exhaustion of administrative remedies under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1997e(a)
(West Supp. 1997). Because Appellant did not demonstrate to the district court that she had exhausted administrative remedies or
that such remedies were not available, the court's dismissal of the
action, without prejudice, was not an abuse of discretion. We
therefore affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished