Salmons v. Dollar General Corp

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Salmons v. Dollar General Corp

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2837

WILMA JEAN SALMONS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

DAVID R. SALMONS,

Plaintiff,

versus

DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION; DOLGENCORP, INCOR- PORATED; TONY MONIODIS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-95- 1416-AMD)

Submitted: December 18, 1997 Decided: January 6, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wilma Jean Salmons, Appellant Pro Se. Neil Alan Morris, Julie Lynette Kitze, NEIL A. MORRIS ASSOCIATES, P.C., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Respon- dents summary judgment on her gender and wage discrimination and

retaliation claims filed under the Equal Pay Act of 1963,

29 U.S.C. § 206

(d) (1994), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as

amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000

(e) (1994). We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Salmons v. Dollar General Corp., No. CA-95-1416-AMD (D. Md. Sept. 30, 1996; Nov. 20, 1996). We deny Dollar General Corporation's motion to correct the docket. We dispense with oral argument be-

cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished