Salmons v. Dollar General Corp
Salmons v. Dollar General Corp
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2837
WILMA JEAN SALMONS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
DAVID R. SALMONS,
Plaintiff,
versus
DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION; DOLGENCORP, INCOR- PORATED; TONY MONIODIS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-95- 1416-AMD)
Submitted: December 18, 1997 Decided: January 6, 1998
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wilma Jean Salmons, Appellant Pro Se. Neil Alan Morris, Julie Lynette Kitze, NEIL A. MORRIS ASSOCIATES, P.C., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Respon- dents summary judgment on her gender and wage discrimination and
retaliation claims filed under the Equal Pay Act of 1963,
29 U.S.C. § 206(d) (1994), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as
amended,
42 U.S.C. § 2000(e) (1994). We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Salmons v. Dollar General Corp., No. CA-95-1416-AMD (D. Md. Sept. 30, 1996; Nov. 20, 1996). We deny Dollar General Corporation's motion to correct the docket. We dispense with oral argument be-
cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished