Harbison Station v. Cordero
Harbison Station v. Cordero
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1989
HARBISON STATION APARTMENTS,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DENISE CORDERO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-1841-3-17BD)
Submitted: December 18, 1997 Decided: January 6, 1998
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Denise Cordero, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Elford Carpenter, Jr., RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN, CARPENTER & ROBINSON, Columbia, South Caro- lina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order remanding
this case to the state court. A district court order remanding a
case to the state court from which it was removed generally is not
appealable.
28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (1994); Thermtron Prods., Inc. v. Hermansdorfer,
423 U.S. 336, 342(1976); Nutter v. Monongahela
Power Co.,
4 F.3d 319, 321(4th Cir. 1993). Because none of the
exceptions apply here, we dismiss the appeal from the remand order.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished