Harbison Station v. Cordero

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Harbison Station v. Cordero

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1989

HARBISON STATION APARTMENTS,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DENISE CORDERO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-1841-3-17BD)

Submitted: December 18, 1997 Decided: January 6, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Denise Cordero, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Elford Carpenter, Jr., RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN, CARPENTER & ROBINSON, Columbia, South Caro- lina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order remanding

this case to the state court. A district court order remanding a

case to the state court from which it was removed generally is not

appealable.

28 U.S.C. § 1447

(d) (1994); Thermtron Prods., Inc. v. Hermansdorfer,

423 U.S. 336, 342

(1976); Nutter v. Monongahela

Power Co.,

4 F.3d 319, 321

(4th Cir. 1993). Because none of the

exceptions apply here, we dismiss the appeal from the remand order.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished