U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Harbison Station v. Cordero

Harbison Station v. Cordero
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 6, 1998

Harbison Station v. Cordero

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1989

HARBISON STATION APARTMENTS, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

DENISE CORDERO, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-1841-3-17BD)

Submitted: December 18, 1997 Decided: January 6, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Denise Cordero, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Elford Carpenter, Jr., RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN, CARPENTER & ROBINSON, Columbia, South Caro- lina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order remanding this case to the state court. A district court order remanding a case to the state court from which it was removed generally is not appealable. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (1994); Thermtron Prods., Inc. v. Hermansdorfer, 423 U.S. 336, 342 (1976); Nutter v. Monongahela Power Co., 4 F.3d 319, 321 (4th Cir. 1993). Because none of the exceptions apply here, we dismiss the appeal from the remand order.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑