Harbison Station v. Cordero
Harbison Station v. Cordero
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1989
HARBISON STATION APARTMENTS, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
DENISE CORDERO, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-1841-3-17BD)
Submitted: December 18, 1997 Decided: January 6, 1998
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Denise Cordero, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Elford Carpenter, Jr., RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN, CARPENTER & ROBINSON, Columbia, South Caro- lina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order remanding this case to the state court. A district court order remanding a case to the state court from which it was removed generally is not appealable. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (1994); Thermtron Prods., Inc. v. Hermansdorfer, 423 U.S. 336, 342 (1976); Nutter v. Monongahela Power Co., 4 F.3d 319, 321 (4th Cir. 1993). Because none of the exceptions apply here, we dismiss the appeal from the remand order.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.