United States v. Groves

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Groves

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7486

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BEVIL LEE GROVES, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-92-28-3-1-H, CA-96-241-5-H)

Submitted: November 25, 1997 Decided: January 13, 1998

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bevil Lee Groves, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Tracy David Knox, UNITED STATES ARMY, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying his

motion filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

(1994) (current version at

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West 1994 & Supp. 1997)) and his Fed. R. Civ. P.

60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Groves, Nos. CR-92-28-3-1-H; CA-96-241-5-H (E.D.N.C. Apr. 26 and

May 13, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy,

521 U.S. ___

,

1997 WL 338568

(U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We deny Appellant's motion to

remand this case for new trial. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-

sional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished