United States v. Apple
United States v. Apple
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6913
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
STACY NEVIN APPLE, a/k/a Satchel Pomme, a/k/a Stacey Apple,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CR-88-174-H, CA-97-1183-H)
Submitted: October 21, 1997 Decided: January 22, 1998
Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stacy Nevin Apple, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Manuelian, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-
pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Apple, Nos. CR-88-174-H; CA-97-1183-H (D. Md. June 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished