United States v. Apple

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Apple

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6913

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

STACY NEVIN APPLE, a/k/a Satchel Pomme, a/k/a Stacey Apple,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CR-88-174-H, CA-97-1183-H)

Submitted: October 21, 1997 Decided: January 22, 1998

Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stacy Nevin Apple, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Manuelian, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Apple, Nos. CR-88-174-H; CA-97-1183-H (D. Md. June 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished