Sumrell v. Stallings

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Sumrell v. Stallings

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2461

DAVID KEITH SUMRELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MOODY E. STALLINGS, JR.; MARY SUE TERRY, Former Attorney General; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; DIXON L. FOSTER, Honorable Judge, Retired; SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA; RICHARD C. VORHIS, Assistant Bar Counsel; VIRGINIA STATE BAR; GEORGE ALLEN, Governor; OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-97-115-2)

Submitted: December 16, 1997 Decided: January 20, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Keith Sumrell, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Edward Martin-Gayle, STALLINGS & RICHARDSON, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Grover C. Wright, Jr., Virginia Beach, Virginia; Catherine Currin Hammond, Gregory E. Lucyk, Peter Robert Messitt, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

petition for an order vacating his conviction. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Sumrell v. Stallings, No. CA-97-115-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 19, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished