Mayle v. State of WV

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Mayle v. State of WV

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7328

WILBERT MAYLE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-146-2)

Submitted: January 13, 1998 Decided: January 30, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilbert Mayle, Appellant Pro Se. Carol A. Egnatoff, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

(1994) (current

version at

28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to ap-

peal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Mayle v. West Virginia, No. CA-94-146-2 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 2, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy,

521 U.S. ___

,

1997 WL 338568

(U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished