U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Mayle v. State of WV

Mayle v. State of WV
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 30, 1998

Mayle v. State of WV

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7328

WILBERT MAYLE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-146-2)

Submitted: January 13, 1998 Decided: January 30, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wilbert Mayle, Appellant Pro Se. Carol A. Egnatoff, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to ap- peal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Mayle v. West Virginia, No. CA-94-146-2 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 2, 1996).

See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.