U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Lane v. State of NC

Lane v. State of NC
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 30, 1998

Lane v. State of NC

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7642

JEFFREY ALLEN LANE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-741-5-BO(3))

Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 30, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey Allen Lane, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his pe- tition for mandamus. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lane v. North Caro- lina, No. CA-97-741-5-BO(3) (E.D.N.C. Oct. 27, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.