Smith v. Fleming
Smith v. Fleming
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7278
MICHAEL SEWELL SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RUFUS R. FLEMING, Warden; CAPTAIN BENNETT; CAPTAIN WHITLOW; M. HICKS; G. WADE; M. L. HILL; SERGEANT WHITEHEAD; SERGEANT FERGUSON; SERGEANT MOORE; C/O GOIN; C/O HUDSON; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-843-2)
Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 28, 1998
Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Sewell Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion granting summary judgment and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Smith v. Fleming, No. CA-95-843-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 8, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished