U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Armento v. Laser Image Inc

Armento v. Laser Image Inc
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 28, 1998

Armento v. Laser Image Inc

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2707

GREGORY G. ARMENTO, d/b/a Tradewind Marketing and Design, d/b/a Cumulus Creative Communica- tions, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

THE LASER IMAGE, INCORPORATED; DOUGLAS W.

SHERRY, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-95-102-1)

Submitted: January 20, 1998 Decided: January 28, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory G. Armento, Appellant Pro Se. David Michael Carter, CARTER & SCHNEDLER, Asheville, North Carolina; John Craig Cloninger, BLUE, FELLERATH, CLONINGER, BARBOUR & ARCURI, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order entering judgment in favor of Defendants after a bench trial on Appellant's copyright and contract claims. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Armento v. Laser Image, Inc., No. CA-95-102-1 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.