McCoy v. Smith

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

McCoy v. Smith

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6721

FRANKIE L. MCCOY, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SEWALL B. SMITH, Warden; THEODORE PURNELL, Security Chief; E. WOOD, Sergeant; CAROL JACK- SON; CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SYSTEMS; BERNARD SMITH; PATRICIA GOINS; S. CHESTER, Correc- tional Officer, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-92- 952-L)

Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 27, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Toni-Jean Lisa, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip Melton Andrews, KRAMON & GRAHAM, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. McCoy v. Smith, No. CA-92-952-L (D. Md. Apr. 23, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished