Hopkins v. University of MD Col
Hopkins v. University of MD Col
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2288
EDITH HOPKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND AT COLLEGE PARK,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 94-3549-DKC)
Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 27, 1998
Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edith Hopkins, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Love Donahue, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary
judgment to the Defendant in a discrimination case filed under the
Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII)1 and the Age Employment Dis- crimination Act (AEDA).2 We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court.3 We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
1 See
42 U.S.C. § 2000(e)-16 (1994). 2 See
29 U.S.C. § 633(a) (1994). 3 Hopkins v. University of Maryland, No. CA-94-3549-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 15, 1997).
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished