Watts v. Metzger
Watts v. Metzger
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7432
JAMES EDMOND WATTS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JOHN B. METZGER, III; VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD; OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-946-R)
Submitted: January 13, 1998 Decided: January 26, 1998
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Edmond Watts, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 &
Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-
tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Watts v. Metzger, No. CA-96-946-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 23, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished