Newby v. Pearson
Newby v. Pearson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7495
FLOYD NEWBY, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
EDDIE PEARSON, Warden; MR. PONTON, Assistant Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, District Judge. (CA-97-48-AM)
Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 4, 1998
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Floyd Newby, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's
order denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaint under
28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is friv-
olous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Newby v. Pearson, CA-97-48-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished