U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Lemus v. INS

Lemus v. INS
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 4, 1998

Lemus v. INS

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1746

JOSE ANTONIO LEMUS, Petitioner, versus

U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (No. A70-627-282)

Submitted: December 9, 1997 Decided: February 4, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Manuel Rivera, Jr., MANUEL RIVERA, ESQ. & ASSOCIATES, Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, Donald E. Keener, Deputy Director, Nolon J. Benson, Jr., Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant Jose Antonio Lemus seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' opinion and order dismissing his appeal and affirming the immigration judge's decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of deportation. Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based on substantial evi- dence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review and affirm the Board's order. See Lemus v. INS, No. A70-627-282 (B.I.A. May 19, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.