Kuplen v. Reno
Kuplen v. Reno
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7017
JOHN EDWARD KUPLEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JANET RENO; MICHAEL EASLEY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-264-5-CT-BR2)
Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 4, 1998
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Edward Kuplen, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief
on his complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief. We have
reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Kuplen v. Reno, No. CA-97-264-5-CT-BR2 (E.D.N.C. June 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished