United States v. Hyppolite
United States v. Hyppolite
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7283
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TERVEUS HYPPOLITE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-93-40, CA-97-74-4-H)
Submitted: January 27, 1998 Decided: February 18, 1998
Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terveus Hyppolite, Appellant Pro Se. Captain Benjamin Clarke Hall, OFFICE OF THE STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hyppolite, Nos. CR-93-40; CA-97-74-4-H (E.D.N.C. July 25, 1997). To the extent Appellant
claims ineffective assistance of counsel because trial counsel
failed to adequately argue Appellant's Fourth Amendment issue and failed to adequately impeach a Government witness, we find that
Appellant failed to establish that his attorney's performance fell
below an objective standard of reasonably competent assistance. See Strickland v. Washington,
466 U.S. 668, 687(1984). We find Appel-
lant's claim that the district court failed to compel a response
from the Government meritless because Appellant failed to establish how this prejudiced him. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished