Whittlesey v. Circuit Court MD
Whittlesey v. Circuit Court MD
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6702
JAMES LOUIS WHITTLESEY, a/k/a Frank Wayne Pehringer,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
CIRCUIT COURT OF MARYLAND FOR BALTIMORE COUNTY; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-874-JFM)
Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: February 26, 1998
Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Louis Whittlesey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
his petition filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 & Supp.
1997) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed
the record and the district court's orders and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Whittlesey v. Circuit Court of Maryland, No. CA-97-874-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 31 & May 6, 1997). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished