Whittlesey v. Circuit Court MD

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Whittlesey v. Circuit Court MD

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6702

JAMES LOUIS WHITTLESEY, a/k/a Frank Wayne Pehringer,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

CIRCUIT COURT OF MARYLAND FOR BALTIMORE COUNTY; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-874-JFM)

Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: February 26, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Louis Whittlesey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp.

1997) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's orders and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Whittlesey v. Circuit Court of Maryland, No. CA-97-874-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 31 & May 6, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished