U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Whittlesey v. Circuit Court MD

Whittlesey v. Circuit Court MD
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 26, 1998

Whittlesey v. Circuit Court MD

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6702

JAMES LOUIS WHITTLESEY, a/k/a Frank Wayne Pehringer, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

CIRCUIT COURT OF MARYLAND FOR BALTIMORE COUNTY; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-874-JFM)

Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: February 26, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Louis Whittlesey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Whittlesey v. Circuit Court of Maryland, No. CA-97-874-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 31 & May 6, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.