U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Idema v. Robinson

Idema v. Robinson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 26, 1998

Idema v. Robinson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6458

JONATHAN IDEMA; PATRICIA DAWN GLOSSON, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus

GRETCHIN ROBINSON; ROBERT H. FOX; DILLARD MARTIN; DELORES R. STEPHEN; TAMARA BARTLEY; UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS, A THROUGH X, Defendants - Appellees, and

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CA-96-56-5-CT-F)

Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: February 26, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan Idema, Patricia Dawn Glosson, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal the district court's order dismissing their complaint. The district court revoked in forma pauperis status that it had previously granted earlier in the proceeding and ordered Appellants to pay the filing fee. The court then dismissed the case when Appellants failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court's order. We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.