Brinkley v. Walter Reed Army Med
Brinkley v. Walter Reed Army Med
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2531
JOHN A. BRINKLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-97- 3090-MJG)
Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: February 26, 1998
Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John A. Brinkley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Brinkley v. Walter Reed Army Medical Ctr., No. CA-97-3090- MJG (D. Md. Oct. 8, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished