Brinkley v. Walter Reed Army Med

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Brinkley v. Walter Reed Army Med

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2531

JOHN A. BRINKLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-97- 3090-MJG)

Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: February 26, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John A. Brinkley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Brinkley v. Walter Reed Army Medical Ctr., No. CA-97-3090- MJG (D. Md. Oct. 8, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished