Brinkley v. Walter Reed Army Med
Brinkley v. Walter Reed Army Med
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2531
JOHN A. BRINKLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-97- 3090-MJG)
Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: February 26, 1998
Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John A. Brinkley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brinkley v. Walter Reed Army Medical Ctr., No. CA-97-3090- MJG (D. Md. Oct. 8, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.