Davis v. Runyon

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Davis v. Runyon

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2518

MICHAEL B. DAVIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARVIN RUNYON, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Lynchburg. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-96-40-L)

Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: February 24, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael B. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Alice Lucille Covington, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Washington, D.C.; Alonzo Harrison Long, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Appel-

lee's motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and

the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-

ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court and deny

Appellant's motion to authorize a transcript at the government's expense. Davis v. Runyon, No. CA-96-40-L (W.D. Va. Oct. 6, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished