United States v. LaBoy
United States v. LaBoy
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7477
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RAUL LABOY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-91-87-BO, CA-97-69-4-BO)
Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: March 4, 1998
Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raul LaBoy, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1997)
with respect to his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel,
the government's failure to file a notice of intent to seek an en-
hanced penalty, and the district court's violation of Fed. R. Crim. P. 11. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability, deny Appellant's motion to appoint counsel, and
dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. LaBoy, Nos. CR-91-87-BO; CA-97-69-4-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 4,
1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished