United States v. LaBoy

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. LaBoy

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7477

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RAUL LABOY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-91-87-BO, CA-97-69-4-BO)

Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: March 4, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raul LaBoy, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West 1994 & Supp. 1997)

with respect to his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel,

the government's failure to file a notice of intent to seek an en-

hanced penalty, and the district court's violation of Fed. R. Crim. P. 11. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability, deny Appellant's motion to appoint counsel, and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. LaBoy, Nos. CR-91-87-BO; CA-97-69-4-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 4,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished