U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

United States v. Honeyblue

United States v. Honeyblue
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 4, 1998

United States v. Honeyblue

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7802

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

JOSEPH HONEYBLUE, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-153-G, CA-97-61-2)

Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: March 4, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Honeyblue, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman, As- sistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record, the district court's opinions, and the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Honeyblue, Nos. CR-91-153-G; CA-97-61-2 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 25, 1997; Nov. 28, 1997).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.