Bishop v. French
Bishop v. French
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6891
STEPHEN MARK BISHOP,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JAMES FRENCH, Warden of Central Prison; FRANKLIN FREEMAN, Secretary of North Carolina Department of Correction; NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CA-96-771-2)
Submitted: January 30, 1998 Decided: March 20, 1998
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stephen Mark Bishop, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 &
Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. Bishop v. French, No. CA-96-771-2 (M.D.N.C. May 22, 1997). We also deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished