United States v. Reese
United States v. Reese
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7624
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CHRISTOPHER E. REESE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CR-91-468-A, CA-97-1826)
Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 19, 1998
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher E. Reese, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Edward Rich, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his Peti-
tion for Writ of Error Coram Nobis. Our review of the record and
the district court's opinion discloses no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Reese, Nos. CR-91-468-A; CA-97-1826 (E.D. Va. Oct. 15,
1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished