United States v. Calloway

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Calloway

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7458

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EDWARD CALLOWAY, a/k/a Stink,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CR-92-113, CA-96-393-N)

Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 19, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Calloway, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his

motion filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

(1994) (current version at

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Lindh v. Murphy,

521 U.S. ___

,

1997 WL 338568

(U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298); United States v. Calloway, Nos. CR-92-113; CA-96-393-N (E.D. Va. Apr. 4, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished