United States v. Calloway
United States v. Calloway
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7458
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
EDWARD CALLOWAY, a/k/a Stink,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CR-92-113, CA-96-393-N)
Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 19, 1998
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Calloway, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his
motion filed under
28 U.S.C. § 2255(1994) (current version at
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the
record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Lindh v. Murphy,
521 U.S. ___,
1997 WL 338568(U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298); United States v. Calloway, Nos. CR-92-113; CA-96-393-N (E.D. Va. Apr. 4, 1997). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished