United States v. Bennett
United States v. Bennett
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7431
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ANTHONY AUGUSTAS BENNETT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CR-94-189, CA-97-241-6)
Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 19, 1998
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Kieran Maher, RUDOLF & MAHER, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Ronald Edward Schwartz, RONALD E. SCHWARTZ - ATTORNEY-AT-LAW, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. Benjamin H. White, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil- ity and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
United States v. Bennett, Nos. CR-94-189; CA-97-241-6 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 1, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished