Thomas v. Beshears
Thomas v. Beshears
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7598
TON JULIUS THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
EARL BESHEARS, Warden; EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; GEORGIA PERDUE, R.N.; RAZAAK ENIOLA, Dr.; DALE KERSHOW, Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-406-JFM)
Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 19, 1998
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ton Julius Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., At- torney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Joseph Barry Chazen, Gina Marie Smith, MEYERS, BILLINGSLEY, RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, P.A., Riverdale, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Thomas v. Beshears, No. CA-97-406-JFM (D. Md. Oct. 1, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished