U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Thomas v. Beshears

Thomas v. Beshears
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 19, 1998

Thomas v. Beshears

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7598

TON JULIUS THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

EARL BESHEARS, Warden; EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; GEORGIA PERDUE, R.N.; RAZAAK ENIOLA, Dr.; DALE KERSHOW, Officer, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-406-JFM)

Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 19, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ton Julius Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., At- torney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Joseph Barry Chazen, Gina Marie Smith, MEYERS, BILLINGSLEY, RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, P.A., Riverdale, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Thomas v. Beshears, No. CA-97-406-JFM (D. Md. Oct. 1, 1997).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten- tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.