U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Driggers v. Smith

Driggers v. Smith
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 18, 1998

Driggers v. Smith

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7421

JIMMY GARFIELD DRIGGERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

D. SMITH, Warden; M. GILLIGAN, Officer; E. O.

TRENT, Sergeant, Defendants - Appellees, and

KENNY HALL; OFFICER CAMPBELL, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-1169-AM)

Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 18, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Garfield Driggers, Appellant Pro Se. Collin Jefferson Hite, SANDS, ANDERSON, MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Driggers v. Smith, No. CA-96-1169-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 3, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.