Booth v. Prince George Health
Booth v. Prince George Health
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2509
KEITH E. BOOTH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT'S OFFICE ON AIDS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 93-3905-PJM)
Submitted: February 24, 1998 Decided: March 18, 1998
Before WIDENER, ERVIN, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith E. Booth, Appellant Pro Se. John Anthony Bielec, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Booth appeals the district court's order granting summary
judgment to the Defendants and dismissing Booth's action under
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to
2000e-16 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997), for failure to establish a prima
facie case of discrimination. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Booth v. Prince George's County, No. CA-93-3905-JFM (D. Md. Sept. 19, 1996). We
deny Booth's "Motion Request for Reconsideration." We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished