Anderson v. Hale

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Anderson v. Hale

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7344

DAVID W. ANDERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MS. HALE, Assistant Superintendent, Appala- chian Correctional Unit; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-501-R)

Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 18, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David W. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Anderson v. Hale, No. CA-97-501-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 17, 1997). We deny Appellant's motions for the preparation of transcripts at

Government's expense, to appoint counsel, and to file a formal

brief. We grant Appellant's motion to proceed without oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-

sional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished