Stone v. Sullivan's Auto Body
Stone v. Sullivan's Auto Body
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2384
HALLIE N. STONE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SULLIVAN'S AUTO BODY, (Trading as) its assign- ees, and for successors in interest; RICHARD L. SULLIVAN, JR., Owner, individually in his private capacity; JOHN RICE, Manager, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-97-483-A)
Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 16, 1998
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hallie N. Stone, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Gillen Fenske, KALBAUGH, PFUND & MESSERSMITH, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the denial of a discovery motion in the
underlying action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction
because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise juris-
diction only over final orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1291(1994), and cer-
tain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1292(1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541(1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order
nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished