Quinn v. Clerk's Office
Quinn v. Clerk's Office
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2653
SAMUEL D. QUINN, Movant - Appellant, versus
CLERK'S OFFICE, U. S. District Court at Roanoke, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (MISC-97-53-R)
Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 16, 1998
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel D. Quinn, Appellant Pro Se. Robert P. Crouch, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his request for documents under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Quinn v. Clerk's Office, No. MISC-97-53-R (W.D. Va. Nov. 21, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.