U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

United States v. Williams

United States v. Williams
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 26, 1998

United States v. Williams

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7735

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

NAMOND EARL WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge; Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-135-K, CA-97-1256- JFM)

Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 26, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Namond Earl Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Katharine Jacobs Armen- trout, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court, and deny Appellant's motion to supplement the record. United States v. Williams, Nos. CR-90-135-K; CA-97-1256-JFM (D. Md. Oct.

30 & Nov. 10, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.