Oliver v. Ervin
Oliver v. Ervin
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7689
GREGORY OLIVER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THOMAS J. ERVIN, Judge; GEORGE DUCWORTH, Solicitor; CARL ANDERSON, Magistrate; HARVEY E. BLACK, Deputy; MICHAEL F. EPPS, Deputy,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-97-2264-2-19AJ)
Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 26, 1998
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Oliver, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Oliver v. Ervin, No. CA-97-2264-2-19AJ (D.S.C. Nov. 5, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished