Oliver v. Ervin

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Oliver v. Ervin

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7689

GREGORY OLIVER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS J. ERVIN, Judge; GEORGE DUCWORTH, Solicitor; CARL ANDERSON, Magistrate; HARVEY E. BLACK, Deputy; MICHAEL F. EPPS, Deputy,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-97-2264-2-19AJ)

Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 26, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Oliver, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Oliver v. Ervin, No. CA-97-2264-2-19AJ (D.S.C. Nov. 5, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished