Lloyd v. Beshears

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Lloyd v. Beshears

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7664

WINSTON LLOYD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

EARL BESHEARS, Warden, E.C.I.; ATTORNEY GEN- ERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA- 97-3562-S)

Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 26, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Winston Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his

28 U.S.C. § 2241

(1994) petition. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Lloyd v. Beshears, No. CA-97-3562-S (D. Md. Nov. 5, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion to supplement the evidence. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished