U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Alascio v. Worcester Cty Comm

Alascio v. Worcester Cty Comm
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 26, 1998

Alascio v. Worcester Cty Comm

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7796

WILLIAM ALASCIO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

WORCESTER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; JAMES BARRETT; IRA SHOCKLEY, Warden; ROBERT C. LAMAR, Dr., Worcester County Jail, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-376-JFM)

Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 26, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Alascio, Appellant Pro Se. Linda S. Woolf, GOODELL, DEVRIES, LEECH & GRAY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider a previous order in which the court granted summary judgment to defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opin- ion and order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Alascio v. Worcester County Comm'rs, No. CA-97-376-JFM (D. Md. Nov. 26, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.