United States v. LaForce
United States v. LaForce
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7646
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RICKY D. LAFORCE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-91-32, CA-97-252-R)
Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 25, 1998
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ricky D. LaForce, Appellant Pro Se. Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-
pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. LaForce, Nos. CR-91-32; CA-97-252-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 18, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished