U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Johnson v. Frazier

Johnson v. Frazier
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 23, 1998

Johnson v. Frazier

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2451

THOMAS J. JOHNSON, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

THOMAS C. FRAZIER, Commissioner; RICHARD WAYBRIGHT; GUY GERSTEL; DONALD F. WALTEMEYER, detective; THE BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-97-2470-WMN)

Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 23, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas J. Johnson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Sara Angeletti, BALTI- MORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Baltimore, Maryland; Eileen Antoinette Carpenter, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Johnson v. Frazier, No. CA-97-2470-WMN (D. Md. Sept. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.