U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Hackworth v. DOWCP

Hackworth v. DOWCP
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 23, 1998

Hackworth v. DOWCP

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1888

ZELPHIA HACKWORTH, Widow of James W.

Hackworth, Petitioner, versus

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; JEWELL RIDGE COAL CORPORATION, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (96-1391-BLA)

Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 23, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Zelphia Hackworth, Petitioner Pro Se. Patricia May Nece, Helen H.

Cox, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.; Timothy Ward Gresham, PENN, STUART, ESKRIDGE & JONES, Abingdon, Virginia, for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Petitioner seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's deci- sion and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (1994). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Hackworth v. DOWCP, No. 96-1391-BLA (BRB June 20, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.