Gillis v. Crestar Bank

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Gillis v. Crestar Bank

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2679

LEON HILTON GILLIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CRESTAR BANK; RIDPATH AGENCY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-455-R)

Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 23, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, * and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leon Hilton Gillis, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffery Scott Sexton, GENTRY, LOCKE, RAKES & MOORE, Roanoke, Virginia; Robert Malcolm Duncan Turk, JEBO & TURK, Radford, Virginia, for Appellees.

* Judge Williams did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 46

(d). Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting the

Defendants' motion to dismiss his complaint alleging age discrim-

ination in the making of a loan, because it was barred by the

applicable statute of limitations.* We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accord-

ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gillis v. Crestar Bank, No. CA-97-455-R (W.D. Va. Nov. 6, 1997). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* A two-year statute of limitations applies to Appellant's claim. See 15 U.S.C.A. § 1691e(f) (West 1998).

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished