Foti v. Arlington Cty Bd Sup
Foti v. Arlington Cty Bd Sup
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2708
MICHAEL A. FOTI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ARLINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; EMPLOYEE'S SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT BOARD OF TRUSTEES; ALAN V. CHRISTENSON, Director of Personnel; SALLY GROVE MAY, Personnel; ARA L. TRAMBLIAN, Assistant County Attorney; LISA BRYANT FOWLER, Assistant County Attorney; IRWIN MAZIN; HERBERT E. LANE, JR.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-97-872-1-A)
Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 23, 1998
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael A. Foti, Appellant Pro Se. David Frederick Dabbs, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTH, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia; Nelson David Cary, SEYFARTH, SHAW, FAIRWEATHER & GERALDSON, Washington, D.C.; Thomas Michael Hogan, GODARD, WEST & ADELMAN, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his
action alleging a number of claims arising out of his former
employment. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Foti v. Arlington County Bd. of Supervisors, No. CA-97-872-1-A (E.D. Va. Nov. 14, 1997). We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished