U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Foti v. Arlington Cty Bd Sup

Foti v. Arlington Cty Bd Sup
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 23, 1998

Foti v. Arlington Cty Bd Sup

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2708

MICHAEL A. FOTI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

ARLINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; EMPLOYEE'S SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT BOARD OF TRUSTEES; ALAN V. CHRISTENSON, Director of Personnel; SALLY GROVE MAY, Personnel; ARA L.

TRAMBLIAN, Assistant County Attorney; LISA BRYANT FOWLER, Assistant County Attorney; IRWIN MAZIN; HERBERT E. LANE, JR., Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-97-872-1-A)

Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 23, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael A. Foti, Appellant Pro Se. David Frederick Dabbs, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTH, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia; Nelson David Cary, SEYFARTH, SHAW, FAIRWEATHER & GERALDSON, Washington, D.C.; Thomas Michael Hogan, GODARD, WEST & ADELMAN, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his action alleging a number of claims arising out of his former employment. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Foti v. Arlington County Bd. of Supervisors, No. CA-97-872-1-A (E.D. Va. Nov. 14, 1997). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.