Floyd v. United States
Floyd v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2417
LIZA FLOYD, individually and as Representative of the Estate of Marvin Floyd and Mike Floyd,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, its agencies, Farm Service Agency (f/k/a Farmer's Home Adminis- tration) and Small Business Administration acting on behalf of the United States of America,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-2082-12AJ)
Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 23, 1998
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Liza Floyd, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Parkwood Griffith, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary
judgment to the Defendants in this civil action brought pursuant to
the Federal Torts Claim Act and
42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 2671 (1994). We
have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Floyd v. United States, No. CA-96-2082-12AJ (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished