U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Floyd v. United States

Floyd v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 23, 1998

Floyd v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2417

LIZA FLOYD, individually and as Representative of the Estate of Marvin Floyd and Mike Floyd, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, its agencies, Farm Service Agency (f/k/a Farmer's Home Adminis- tration) and Small Business Administration acting on behalf of the United States of America, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-2082-12AJ)

Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 23, 1998

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Liza Floyd, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Parkwood Griffith, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendants in this civil action brought pursuant to the Federal Torts Claim Act and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 2671 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Floyd v. United States, No. CA-96-2082-12AJ (D.S.C. Sept.

29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.